Body and Mind in Two Discourses on Method

The point of departure my presentation will be the fact that in his monumental History Autobiography, Georg Misch considered Descartes’ Discourse on Method a fine example intellectual autobiography.
 Yet, is highly complex text far from simple autobiography. And what even more, and more disturbing for work, made intensive use Dilthey’s concept an autobiography was meant to capture sense “life as narrating itself” laying down proper, i.e. “objective” foundation historical sciences. But how shall we take “sincerity” this case, which distinguishing feature real Dilthey-Misch sense?
 I apply kind hermeneutic method trying move back forth double circle: look at Misch’s whole autobiography, data Descartes’s life works presented Baillet’s Life Monsieur Des Cartes order understand autobiographic character moving again details vice versa. In view, “history intellect” cannot taken nor usual sense. body-mind problem play important role argumentation.